Setting up my brand new Pixel 4 XL with . First order of things, connected to my @RoninDojoUI, it's sooooo fast. Many thanks to 🙏
Conversation
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Question was for Raker57 actually.
Having used both, I’ve found Copperhead more reliable with better performance as well as proper support.
2
6
Please note that is selling devices using CopperheadOS and has a financial interest in spreading misinformation about GrapheneOS and promoting their product. They are actively violating our open source licenses and taking our code without credit.
2
5
I had no financial interest. You told me not to use your code so I set up a company because I just wanted a working android device for the love of God.
Own goal on your part.
1
4
You're using our work and you're in violation of our open source licenses. You've taken to regularly spreading misinformation as part of your attempts to harm the open source project that you're leeching off for profit.
I'm not using your work though. You're welcome to prove those claims in court as opposed to social media.
1
2
You are using our code. Again, the specific example of github.com/GrapheneOS/har. It is easy to confirm that this code is in CopperheadOS and was taken from us. The same for nearly everything else that is changed. It's just a poorly done, insecure ripoff of GrapheneOS's old code.
1
2
Show replies
github.com/GrapheneOS/har was written entirely after the split with Copperhead and has a license requiring attribution. CopperheadOS has included an old version of this without following the license, and you're selling devices based on it. This is just one of many examples of this.
2
1
Taking credit for our work and falsely claiming to have developed it is fraud. Respecting the licenses is also not something optional. Open source does not mean you can treat it as not being copyrighted. Please stop selling devices with our code in violation of the licenses.
1
1
1
Show replies