Conversation

Replying to and
It uses lower time complexity algorithms, avoids lots of unnecessary work and has built-in implementations of commonly used shell commands. It has clever things like a built-in $(shell find) where it can track the timestamps of those directories and avoid running find again.
1
10
It's not just that ninja is faster but that it's a much faster implementation of dealing with make. It's not an entirely complete GNU make implementation and they take the practical approach of requiring minor build system adjustments. It's also more reliable than GNU make.
1
9
It's clever enough to realize that it needs to cope with environment variables changing, etc. compared to GNU make where if you change CFLAGS, it's not going to realize that it actually needs to rebuild everything. It was made as a stopgap while Android moves to Blueprint files.
1
8
I think it would be very useful for many people outside of Android if they knew it existed. There are a lot of other neat tools like this in Android and Chromium. They're huge projects and they come up with some really nice tooling to deal with real problems in a practical way.
3
10
They'll still have uses for it until they've gotten rid of make-based build systems everywhere. Android has been transitioning away from make since 2015. If kati was only intended for Android, it probably wouldn't be hosted on GitHub. It's supposed to become obsolete though.
1
Similar to how they taught it to understand a subset of the find command to heavily optimize based on it by understanding the dependencies for it. Other projects probably do use find calls that are optimized, but probably not as much as Android. Likely have their own bottlenecks.
1
1