Conversation

Replying to
GrapheneOS is not losing support, and I'm talking about the spread of misinformation, not criticism. The number of users is rapidly increasing. Contributions to the project and donations are ramping up. The project is doing better than ever despite coordinated attacks on it.
1
Replying to
Style points for replying with concern trolling to a post linking a dictionary definition of concern troll. Using dishonest, underhanded tactics to attack open source projects and developers isn't limited to Copperhead. The reason it's so damaging is that others participate.
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to
I don't see how actively countering misinformation and defending myself is acting like a victim. Letting it happen uncontested would be that. It's no conspiracy theory that Copperhead is coordinating attacks on the project and developers including misinformation.
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to
It's not speculation. They actively talk about it and coordinate it in their public channels. They closely follow GrapheneOS and the developers and repeatedly reach out to people we talk to and work with in an attempt to cause problems and aggravate existing ones.
1
Replying to
This is not speculation or a conspiracy theory. Perhaps you shouldn't be making false claims about something you clearly aren't familiar with at all. What was your motive to come here and attack myself and GrapheneOS in the first place?
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to
That hasn't happened, and as I said at the top of the thread, people should be wary of those who claim to be supporters or former supporters in order to engage in concern trolling. I never said that Copperhead were the only ones who spread misinformation and concern troll.