There's a coordinated campaign by Copperhead to spread misinformation about GrapheneOS. The approach tends to involve concern trolling: dictionary.com/e/slang/concer.
Be wary of comments claiming to be from people who support GrapheneOS but which spread false narratives attacking it.
Conversation
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to
GrapheneOS is not losing support, and I'm talking about the spread of misinformation, not criticism.
The number of users is rapidly increasing. Contributions to the project and donations are ramping up. The project is doing better than ever despite coordinated attacks on it.
1
Replying to
Style points for replying with concern trolling to a post linking a dictionary definition of concern troll.
Using dishonest, underhanded tactics to attack open source projects and developers isn't limited to Copperhead. The reason it's so damaging is that others participate.
1
Replying to
Perhaps you should reflect on why you're making a reply like this to my post. What is the intent behind it?
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to
I don't see how actively countering misinformation and defending myself is acting like a victim. Letting it happen uncontested would be that. It's no conspiracy theory that Copperhead is coordinating attacks on the project and developers including misinformation.
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to
It's not speculation. They actively talk about it and coordinate it in their public channels. They closely follow GrapheneOS and the developers and repeatedly reach out to people we talk to and work with in an attempt to cause problems and aggravate existing ones.
Replying to
This is not speculation or a conspiracy theory. Perhaps you shouldn't be making false claims about something you clearly aren't familiar with at all. What was your motive to come here and attack myself and GrapheneOS in the first place?
1
Replying to
A reminder that this is how you started replying here:
twitter.com/nQrFG8RdxtvE/s
It's clear that you aren't here to engage in good faith. So, what's the intent behind it?
Is your point that people can spread misinformation and be nasty for other reasons? I never said otherwise.
This Tweet is unavailable.