There's a coordinated campaign by Copperhead to spread misinformation about GrapheneOS. The approach tends to involve concern trolling: dictionary.com/e/slang/concer.
Be wary of comments claiming to be from people who support GrapheneOS but which spread false narratives attacking it.
Conversation
Replying to
They've been very successful at pushing false narratives about what happened. Please refer to grapheneos.org/legal/Micay_%2 for our side of the story. This document explains our claims and is not presenting our evidence. There are witnesses and plenty of other evidence to back it up.
1
1
11
Much of that evidence is part of the public record. There's ample proof already available if you care to look into it.
Part of their strategy is targeting me based on my depression and social anxiety, which they're made far more severe. I am not doing well after years of this.
1
6
GrapheneOS has 6+ developers along with various contributors. You can see a partial list of the core developers at github.com/orgs/GrapheneO. I don't do the majority of development work myself anymore. I focus on mentoring, reviewing code, release engineering, infrastructure, etc.
1
10
The project is thriving thanks to community support despite the continued attacks on it. Donations to the project have allowed us to get phones, workstations and funding for developers. Imagine where it would be if I'd never made the mistake of trusting and working with James.
16
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
Show replies
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to
GrapheneOS is not losing support, and I'm talking about the spread of misinformation, not criticism.
The number of users is rapidly increasing. Contributions to the project and donations are ramping up. The project is doing better than ever despite coordinated attacks on it.
1
Show replies