Conversation

I had removed my tweet about CopperheadOS. I knew this project from a distance memory, and apparently things have changed throughout the years. The original dev then created GrapheneOS. Here is a link to a more detailed explanation, judge it for yourself grapheneos.org/#history

171

Replying to

Thats history section is a wild ride.

Replying to

and

and completely full of 💩

Replying to

and

I'll buy, why is it full of shit?

Replying to

and

why does it exist? to slander me and my company in the hopes that we can't expose the truth about what happened with CopperheadOS. Why is it full of 💩? Because it's completely unverified and a first party source (with an ever growing history of tirades and slander).

Replying to

and

I'm now very interested in this. Any links to an article or blog post where you expound on what you've mentioned here? I'm very interested to hear your side in all this.

Replying to

and

I can provide concrete evidence of what is documented on the GrapheneOS site. The claims being made by James Donaldson here are false and highly misleading. I've filed counter-claims against CopperheadOS and I'm filing my own case focused on their fraudulent copyright claims.

Replying to

and

I'm perfectly willing to show evidence and there are a lot of witnesses able to confirm most aspects of what happened. James is making completely fabricated accusations such as falsely claiming that I threatened / bullied journalists which is an outrageous claim without basis.

Replying to

and

We have not defaced any Wikipedia pages or harassed / threatened anyone. Informing people about what happened on Twitter and elsewhere is not in any way harassment. I have proof for what I'm saying. They do not. James will just misdirect and continue lying about what happened.

Replying to

and

Ask him if I ever had any employment agreement with Copperhead. The answer is no. Ask him if I ever agreed to any specific salary or if it was ever even negotiated. I never did, and the reclassification of business income as a salary was retroactively.

12:37 PM · Oct 30, 2020Twitter Web App

Replying to

and

There was no employment agreement, no salary, no pay stubs, etc. There was never any formal or informal agreement to assign copyright to the company. They've made the outrageous claim that when we both paid $500 for our shares, that somehow magically gave the company ownership

Replying to

and

over my open source work despite never mentioning anything to do with that or the project. It doesn't make any sense. It's not how copyright law works. The project was started in 2014 and incorporated work from much earlier. The work was not done for the company or for James.