Conversation

Forget about my previous Huawei joke, here is my actual hot takes on XDA's phone Pro1-X. Let me get straight to the conclusion: it really is a phone for nobody. I'll break it down to 3 different audiences: normal users, enthusiasts, and finally, developers.

5

19

266

I don't think I need to say much about why normal users should not buy it: old hardware, bad camera, ridiculous pricing Running outdated hw is especially damning. I doubt any OEM will continue to update the OS after the components are no longer supported

Do you REALLY want a Keyboard on your Phone??? - F(x)Tec Pro 1 Phone

The F(x)Tec Pro 1 phone might be the best (or only) option out there for people who want a full QWERTY hardware keyboard on their smartphone. It even has arr...

1

2

96

For enthusiasts, it is literally an existing phone slapped on an XDA logo and LineageOS. If it wants to legally ship with GMS, it still needs to pass CTS, and you still cannot root without breaking SafetyNet. Might as well just buy any popular phone and flash any custom ROM.

2

1

104

For developers, this is no different than any other smartphone, maybe even worse than Pixels. If this phone is for developers, I'd expect almost everything, including the bootloader, to be open source so people can *really* mess around with it. Look at PinePhone, not this one.

3

2

145

So yeah, unless you are a diehard XDA fanboy which drolls over the XDA logo when you look at the back of the phone, I cannot see any reason why anyone should buy one. Let me know your thoughts though, I'd love to know the reasons why you would disagree 😉

7

2

149

Replying to

You're forgetting privacy enthusiasts who do not want to mess with their device and want to have a google free phone with a keyboard out of the box.

9

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

Replying to

and

Both Copperhead and Graphene have very limited hardware support, plus a number of organisational limitations. I've been using e.foundation ROMs for over a year and like it quite a lot.

3

2

Replying to

and

The limited hardware support is because as far as I am aware, only Google Pixel devices support running locked bootloader with 3rd party image signing keys.

3

2

10

Replying to

and

I reached out to

to figure this out. They have an intense personal grudge against GrapheneOS. A bit over a year ago as someone not active in the community, they posted long rants in our Matrix channel with poorly informed, unconstructive criticism and promotion of /e/.

1

1

1

Replying to

I quickly removed the posts and referred to it as ignorant nonsense while making corrections. They persisted in trying to give unwanted, uninformed advice which was also removed. I referred to it as ignorant nonsense and trolling. Looking back, I think it was the right decision.

2:37 PM · Oct 29, 2020Twitter Web App