Conversation

“official BLE specification didn't contain strong-enough language to describe the reconnection process. As a result, 2 systemic issues have made their way into BLE software implementations, down the software supply-chain Android: no fix😱 Apple: fixed😰 Windows: not vulnerable😶
Quote Tweet
BLESA: Bluetooth bug affects billions of devices zdnet.com/article/billio
3
26
Replying to
Google Pixel XL has been end-of-life since November 2019. It hasn't received security updates for almost a year. It's not an indicator of what has been fixed in the monthly security updates and it's strange to be testing the impact of updates on a device not receiving them.
1
2
Replying to
It’s not at all strange to test devices that are still in widespread use. Users still need to be warned of their exposure. Mitigations can often still be provided, even in the absence of official support. A device that went out of support recently absolutely falls in that group
1
2
Replying to
> It’s not at all strange to test devices that are still in widespread use. That's not what I said. I pointed out that it hasn't received OS security updates for almost a year, and it's illogical to use it to test what was fixed in those OS security updates. Doesn't make sense.
1
Replying to
Then I don’t understand the point you came to make & I still don’t. You were saying it didn’t make sense to test against a device that was out of support. I still disagree with that assertion for the reasons I gave. No idea what you’re nitpicking at in 2 separate tweets.
Mtv Awards 2019 Whatever GIF by MTV Movie & TV Awards
GIF
1
Replying to
You posted a tweet stating that the issue isn't fixed on Android, based on it not being fixed on an end-of-life device which doesn't receive the security updates. The paper doesn't say it wasn't fixed on Android. It says it wasn't fixed on their EOL Google Pixel XL device.
2
Show replies