If you prefer silent memory corruption, GrapheneOS was probably a bad choice in the first place. I definitely don't have hatred for users of GrapheneOS. You've made it pretty clear that you are not a user of GrapheneOS. Don't really understand why you're jumping in very late to..
Conversation
... this continuation of a long series of threads and trying to get involved in it while bashing myself and GrapheneOS. It doesn't surprise me. More than tired of people who contribute nothing of value, have an incredibly entitled attitude and deliberately spread misinformation.
1
I don't need your money or bug reports. As far I know, you haven't contributed anything, and you've just showed up here to throw in some irrelevant attacks on me and the project that I work on with others because I didn't like you jumping in here with your "both sides" comment.
2
1
You tend to assume malicious intent when I and others seek only to learn the details behind your positions.
Our goals differ but know I do highly respect you and your work.
I fear the hostile tone you use with anyone that questions you is the only major limiter to your success.
1
3
You weren't originally talking to me. I think you have the intent to push your views and you're willing to make lots of false claims to do that along with engaging in a discussion in a manipulative way. Not malicious intent, rather, an underhanded approach is being used.
2
I mean, here you go again with misrepresenting the issues I've had with this long and extremely frustrating series of threads as far different. A nice summary of the problems.
You went out of the way to involve yourself and write up a huge series of replies before I was there.
1
I think what you were doing is inherently hostile from the start: showing up in random threads to peddle a bunch of dubious claims and misinformation to push your views.
Certainly does a good job at causing stress and disruption of work.
2
You jumprd in on me sharing my opinion that Android is continuing to head in a difficult to audit and maintain direction.
This is an informed by me spending hundreds of hours trying to port devices and automate builds in spite of Google not investing in testing AOSP anymore.
3
1
We have established in our thread that Android is indeed difficult to audit and maintain.
If it is -worth- it or not depends on threat model, and your approach likely is the least bad one for most users today.
I am just not convinced it is viable long term without new hardware.
1
1
> We have established in our thread that Android is indeed difficult to audit and maintain.
You're just misrepresenting the content of the discussion again. This is why engaging with you is problematic. You turn around and misrepresent the discussion and my statements.
1
I'm not going to keep referring back to the same things I have said and running around in circles with someone that's not going to engage in good faith. What you are doing right here is hostile. What do you expect from me when you do that?