I don't think there's much of a useful conversation, and I don't agree with that take on it at all. Been going on forever from a previous mess of threads and it's clearly going nowhere and has pretty much no point. I've gotten no value from it and it's just a waste of time.
Conversation
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
Interested to hear how GrapheneOS is a 'nightmare' to use as a downstream in a way that CalyxOS is not. Sounds like a load of bullshit to me. Also having a hard time understanding how that's relevant to this thread.
2
1
If people want a hobbyist smartphone platform they can buy a Pinephone or something else along those lines instead of getting ripped off by scammers and the evangelists pushing their products based on their dishonest marketing claims and misinformation.
1
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
It has a lot of documentation, and writing documentation is a major area of work.
The camera issues are continuous stream of AOSP and Qualcomm driver bugs that we've been working on for years. A lot of those upstream bugs have been fixed. You have all those bugs on CalyxOS.
1
If you prefer silent memory corruption, GrapheneOS was probably a bad choice in the first place. I definitely don't have hatred for users of GrapheneOS. You've made it pretty clear that you are not a user of GrapheneOS. Don't really understand why you're jumping in very late to..
1
... this continuation of a long series of threads and trying to get involved in it while bashing myself and GrapheneOS. It doesn't surprise me. More than tired of people who contribute nothing of value, have an incredibly entitled attitude and deliberately spread misinformation.
1
I don't need your money or bug reports. As far I know, you haven't contributed anything, and you've just showed up here to throw in some irrelevant attacks on me and the project that I work on with others because I didn't like you jumping in here with your "both sides" comment.
2
1
You tend to assume malicious intent when I and others seek only to learn the details behind your positions.
Our goals differ but know I do highly respect you and your work.
I fear the hostile tone you use with anyone that questions you is the only major limiter to your success.
1
3
You weren't originally talking to me. I think you have the intent to push your views and you're willing to make lots of false claims to do that along with engaging in a discussion in a manipulative way. Not malicious intent, rather, an underhanded approach is being used.
I mean, here you go again with misrepresenting the issues I've had with this long and extremely frustrating series of threads as far different. A nice summary of the problems.
You went out of the way to involve yourself and write up a huge series of replies before I was there.
1
I think what you were doing is inherently hostile from the start: showing up in random threads to peddle a bunch of dubious claims and misinformation to push your views.
Certainly does a good job at causing stress and disruption of work.
2
Show replies
Well you can't prove my intent to you, but I can say with 100% honesty I have had and remain with no intent to manipulate.
I state my current positions and leanings honestly in public with a willingness to learn information that might adjust them from anyone, including you.
1
1
If that were not true I would not of said " I agree with you" several times in my discussion.
There is a difference between sharing an an uninformed opinion and maliciously spreading misinformation.
2
1
Show replies