Conversation
For those who don't know, the actual CopperheadOS ceased to exist a few years ago after the business side partner tried to force the developer to give feds backdoor keys, then fraudulently asserted IP ownership.
4
3
15
The current "product" is a recreation with none of the original security properties the reputation implies.
1
8
Replying to
Also false. I really hope you take your technical research more seriously than your understanding of software licensing and copyright.
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
I'm the creator and owner of the open source project. It was created long before the company was incorporated. Copyright was never assigned to the company. 2 contracts that were signed: incorporation and a shareholder's agreement where both James and I paid $500 for our shares.
1
1
It was agreed upon between the two of us and confirmed on multiple occasions that I would own and control the open source project including the donations to it. Nothing was ever agreed upon to the contrary and certainly no contract was ever signed. This is a clear case of fraud.
There was absolutely never any transfer of ownership over my work, largely created before incorporation. I submitted my work to AOSP, the Linux kernel, etc. as an individual and signed contracts confirming that I owned the code with the full knowledge of Copperhead / James.