A far superior modern version of the project with years of additional research and engineering put into it. It's available as an entirely free, open source project with an active community collaborating to make it. Not sure why anyone wants a proprietary fork of my legacy work...
Conversation
You're using my code while promoting a company doing immense harm to myself and the other developers. The support you're giving them is what enables them to scam people and get the resources they need to cause harm. Your response is to start name calling the person who made it...
1
I don't know the Graphene history but suspect the way you come across to people without context is hurting your cause more than anything I could post.
1
3
You're promoting a product for people to secure their Bitcoin without doing your due diligence about it. The person behind that product stole a huge amount of donations provided by the Bitcoin community to my open source project via trust that was placed in them to handle it.
1
1
Perhaps it's not a good idea to use an OS from someone known to steal Bitcoin donations as a Bitcoin wallet. Just maybe you shouldn't trust a proprietary software fork of an open source project from a company trying to destroy the project they ripped off and screw over the devs.
1
2
If you're going to go around promoting the Craig Wright / nChain of the mobile privacy/security world, expect to be called out. You're promoting a scammer. Do your due diligence and think about how you've been manipulated. If you want to be sweet talked maybe the scam fits you.
1
2
When you talk about licensing and infringement, you're the one that kinda sounds like CSW/nC... Treating a user as a criminal for downloading software will not gain you any sympathy. Maybe share why the original is better, more secure, less centralized, etc... No legal threats.
1
1
GrapheneOS is the original project. Confirm for yourself on GitHub and elsewhere. It is certainly better, more secure and less centralized. It's actually an open source project as it was originally, not depending on cheap outsourced developers porting code they don't understand.
1
2
I don't think it's much to ask that people respect the licenses for the work that I make available for free to them. I don't think twitter.com/DanielMicay/st is a lot to ask either. GrapheneOS is under permissive open source licenses. Legacy code from a period from 2016-2018 is not.
Quote Tweet
If you use my open source code, the least you can do is to stop supporting a sociopath doing everything he can to destroy my life and my work. I've had a couple incredibly rough years because of this and it's escalating rather than ending thanks to people enabling him to do it.
Show this thread
Creating commercial forks of the legacy code or using it commercially is not permitted. If there is some specific code in there that is still relevant / useful, I'm open to people porting it into GrapheneOS and I will happily relicense it as part of them submitting that work.
1
1
You're supporting a proprietary fork of my work from people who are fraudulently claiming ownership of it and trying to wipe out the original open source project through those false claims. They don't want it to exist as an open source project and are working hard to kill it off.
1