I'm a big fan of this "burner android bitcoin phone" idea.
Would be cool if we could run the whole stack on such a device. One app could run the node and the others could consume it.
Conversation
Doing the same. I don't consider it a burner :)
For what its worth, I don't think running a node makes much sense of a mobile device (a SBC is better, remotely connected) because of bandwidth and background connectivity but a hardened android OS like CH, without Google is great.
2
1
9
I'd suggest not using an OS with DRM / tracking and lack of proper maintenance or any privacy/security engineers like CopperheadOS. You're peddling insecure software to people without having any clue what you're talking about. Maybe you should stop feigning expertise you lack.
1
1
1
You support people who intimidate and harass open source developers:
renlord.com/posts/2020-03-
If you're going to support scamming and fraud such as falsely claiming partners, fraudulently claiming ownership over our work and everything else they've done out of spite for me...
2
2
Bore off with your irrelevant comments. You will be happy to know that I am now not using GrapheneOS as per your request (despite you being rude and threatening me) so the reason I am using Copperhead is because of you.
Enjoy your court case. Twitter isn't the place for it.
1
3
Using CopperheadOS means you're violating the non-commercial license for the code that they forked. I told you that you weren't welcome to use my code and that obviously includes CopperheadOS which is simply a poorly maintained fork of my legacy work. Why do you think that's ok?
2
1
Please stop violating the license for my code and supporting / promoting a scammer out of spite. It's absolutely relevant to this conversation that you're promoting a proprietary fork of my work by people trying to screw over the people who created it out of spite towards me.
1
1
Any normal individual would have taken stock of the lack of success of their communication style and adjusted it to better convince their intended audience
You repeat yourself endlessly, rant and make little sense in strings of tweets with laughable threats and pleas. Do better.
1
2
> Any normal individual
So I'm not a "normal individual" because I've spent years being abused by someone and find the whole situation extremely stressful and upsetting?
> their intended audience
My intended audience are the people you're giving bad advice driven out of spite.
1
1
> You repeat yourself endlessly, rant and make little sense in strings of tweets with laughable threats and pleas.
If you say so. I think I've done a good job of explaining things and people need to do their due diligence. It's not my fault you're just choosing to believe James.
2
1
> Do better.
I think you should actually do your due diligence and stop giving uninformed and downright dangerous security advice. Don't pretend to be an expert on a topic that you don't know about. You just repeat false claims from James as if they're actually facts...
Where are the sources for all of the things that you've said about CopperheadOS? What is the basis for you considering it secure? What is your response to the company's harassment of open source developers who they pilfer from not just including myself? renlord.com/posts/2020-03-
1
Quote Tweet
Replying to @DanielMicay
What claims of James have I repeated?