Conversation

Doing the same. I don't consider it a burner :) For what its worth, I don't think running a node makes much sense of a mobile device (a SBC is better, remotely connected) because of bandwidth and background connectivity but a hardened android OS like CH, without Google is great.
2
9
I'd suggest not using an OS with DRM / tracking and lack of proper maintenance or any privacy/security engineers like CopperheadOS. You're peddling insecure software to people without having any clue what you're talking about. Maybe you should stop feigning expertise you lack.
1
1
Bore off with your irrelevant comments. You will be happy to know that I am now not using GrapheneOS as per your request (despite you being rude and threatening me) so the reason I am using Copperhead is because of you. Enjoy your court case. Twitter isn't the place for it.
1
3
Using CopperheadOS means you're violating the non-commercial license for the code that they forked. I told you that you weren't welcome to use my code and that obviously includes CopperheadOS which is simply a poorly maintained fork of my legacy work. Why do you think that's ok?
2
1
Please stop violating the license for my code and supporting / promoting a scammer out of spite. It's absolutely relevant to this conversation that you're promoting a proprietary fork of my work by people trying to screw over the people who created it out of spite towards me.
1
1
Any normal individual would have taken stock of the lack of success of their communication style and adjusted it to better convince their intended audience You repeat yourself endlessly, rant and make little sense in strings of tweets with laughable threats and pleas. Do better.
1
2
> You repeat yourself endlessly, rant and make little sense in strings of tweets with laughable threats and pleas. If you say so. I think I've done a good job of explaining things and people need to do their due diligence. It's not my fault you're just choosing to believe James.
2
1
Show replies