Conversation

Doing the same. I don't consider it a burner :) For what its worth, I don't think running a node makes much sense of a mobile device (a SBC is better, remotely connected) because of bandwidth and background connectivity but a hardened android OS like CH, without Google is great.
2
9
I'd suggest not using an OS with DRM / tracking and lack of proper maintenance or any privacy/security engineers like CopperheadOS. You're peddling insecure software to people without having any clue what you're talking about. Maybe you should stop feigning expertise you lack.
1
1
... that really shows a lot about your character or rather the lack of it. I'm sure you feel real special that James chose you folks to go out of his way to manipulate and pamper. Incredibly sad you can't see through that and support people trying to wipe out what they built on.
1
1
James didn't approach me. I approached J and requested how I could run CopperheadOS after your vile comments and allegations against me and others. I couldn't care less about your legal troubles. They don't interest me. If you include others in the crossfire, expect a response.
3
Bore off with your irrelevant comments. You will be happy to know that I am now not using GrapheneOS as per your request (despite you being rude and threatening me) so the reason I am using Copperhead is because of you. Enjoy your court case. Twitter isn't the place for it.
1
3
Using CopperheadOS means you're violating the non-commercial license for the code that they forked. I told you that you weren't welcome to use my code and that obviously includes CopperheadOS which is simply a poorly maintained fork of my legacy work. Why do you think that's ok?
2
1
Show replies