How does it compare to Graphene? (If you've used both?)
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Conversation
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
As far as I know, GrapheneOS is a fork of Copperhead and broadly understood as its successor.
twitter.com/DanielMicay/st
(Daniel Micay/Graphene accuses James Donaldson/Copperhead of scam/fraud but please DYOR!)
This Tweet is unavailable.
1
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Exactly, original CopperheadOS is continued but the more I read about the reasons of the split, the more I tend to turn away from CH OS and rely on Graphene OS.
twitter.com/DanielMicay/st (Mil-Contractor=Raytheon? 🤔)
Maybe or know some background info?
This Tweet is unavailable.
2
1
GrapheneOS is the original open source project and was founded in 2014, a year before Copperhead was incorporated. A brief overview of the history and copyright ownership is available at grapheneos.org/#history. CopperheadOS is a fork of our legacy codebase by a scam artist.
1
Look at the public record. Look at the code and the history of the project for yourself. Talk to users and observers of the project who were around from early on and witnessed all of this unfold. Can see for yourself that CopperheadOS is not open source and forked from my code.
Can see for yourself that it was founded as an open source project before Copperhead was incorporated. Can see from the code that the attributions of ownership/authorship have always been to me. Can see that I always kept the company and open source project at arms length.
2
Go ahead and look back at it using archive.org. Look at how the donations page said that the money was going to the open source project / developers, not the company. Many of you in the Bitcoin community donated to me and I never actually received any of that money.
1
1
Show replies
Your answer to me asking for information and references is DYOR?? RLY? 😂😂