Conversation

Replying to and
I only said that people supporting them are complicit in the abuse they perpetrate against myself and others. If you don't agree, that's fine, but I hope you can understand why lending credibility and support to fraudsters is harmful and could be considered as being complicit.
1
Replying to and
What you've done is jump onto a pile on against someone that has been harassed and abused for years due to their open source work. Quote tweeting me to try to direct harassment towards me with your misleading take on what happened with Copperhead is not a good look at all.
1
Replying to
If that's your only possible view then I wasn't wrong. There's a lot in your three tweets here that apply exactly to your behaviour in the past hour. You'd do well to take a breather. If you truly believe you're at war with them, wearing yourself down only speeds up attrition.
1
1
Replying to
Copperhead has spent 2 years waging a war against me spreading misinformation and fraudulent claims. They've done immense damage to my life and to the project. There's an ongoing legal battle which is expensive and time consuming. They stole hundreds of thousands of dollars.
1
Replying to and
I'm genuinely quite upset about people claiming to support me while enabling the narcissistic sociopath who screwed me over to continue abusing me by lending him the credibility he so desperately needs, similar to his false claims about partnerships that he puts on their site.
1
Replying to
Learning how to accept that one has no control over what others think and say is a valuable lesson in life. Heck, I even forgot that lesson at some point and it did a real number on me.
1
1
Replying to
I have control over who follows me and if I wanted I could have control over who uses my future work. Maybe I won't continue working on open source projects in the future when the community of users around it is so unsupportive of me even when I desperately need their help.
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
I don't think Trezor supports that and it's the only way I want to handle Bitcoin. I don't really see how it's relevant to these discussions. Finances aren't close to the top thing on my mind right now. There are more pressing issues like the escalating attacks from Copperhead.
1
Replying to and
Tell me how to set up PayNym or something else with Trezor rather than a static address and I'll do it. Keep in mind that someone can make small donations ending up in the same pool of money. I'm not really sure how avoiding the static address can be a viable approach to privacy.
3
1
Replying to and
I filed an issue and you're welcome to help: github.com/GrapheneOS/gra. I don't know how to do it and I don't have the time or energy to work on it. Already looked into BTCPay and it looked like a huge pain to properly set it up / maintain it especially when using it with Trezor.
Replying to and
The vast majority of our expenses covered by donations will likely be legal fees for the near future. Lending Copperhead credibly they don't deserve will effectively cancel out money donated to us by giving them more resources to stir up trouble and waste our time/energy/money.