Exactly, original CopperheadOS is continued but the more I read about the reasons of the split, the more I tend to turn away from CH OS and rely on Graphene OS.
twitter.com/DanielMicay/st (Mil-Contractor=Raytheon? 🤔)
Maybe or know some background info?
Conversation
I don't have the knowledge now nor am I likely to in the future to understand what happened between these guys. Daniel has provided info on Twitter and has been known to be helpful to the community, J at Copperhead has been amazing with correcting any technical misunderstandings
2
1
3
... I have had as well as being very transparent about where his company is going now. From my perspective, the target customer base is quite different and you may want to evaluate the respective sustainability of the business models but both OS's are security wise, world class.
2
1
4
GrapheneOS is an open source project. It's supported by businesses rather than being a business itself. CopperheadOS is not open source and is no longer even source available. They ripped off my legacy work and fraudulently claim ownership over it. What do you think they do?
1
1
All they've really done is pay inexperienced / cheap developers to do a poor job porting my legacy code to newer releases, along with adding DRM/tracking and other changes tied to their business. They do not do any real privacy/security research or engineering work...
1
1
I'm not here for a history lesson with all due respect. I'm just here to run the code.
1
You aren't welcome to do that. I'm not giving you a history lesson. I'm letting you know that you're complicit in abuse and harm perpetrated on myself and others. The only reason that has gone on for so long and caused so much damage is people continuing to support that company.
1
1
Betraying the arrangements made with the project, taking over the infrastructure preventing any further updates to existing devices, stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars of donations, spending years making false / damaging claims about myself and GrapheneOS, harassing myself
2
I said you were complicit in abuse. That means you're an enabler of this ongoing harm and abuse being perpetrated against myself and others. Anyone voicing support for them is complicit through encouraging people to give them support / money which they use to cause harm to us.
I am not complicit of “abuse”. You went off at the wrong person. That Twitter block button is still there for you to use at any time.
1
I don't generally block people on Twitter. The most that I would do is block and unblock you to remove you as a follower and I'm probably not going to do that.