Conversation

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

Exactly, original CopperheadOS is continued but the more I read about the reasons of the split, the more I tend to turn away from CH OS and rely on Graphene OS. twitter.com/DanielMicay/st (Mil-Contractor=Raytheon? 🤔) Maybe

@matt_odell

@maxtannahill

know some background info?

This Tweet is unavailable.

Replying to

and

I don't have the knowledge now nor am I likely to in the future to understand what happened between these guys. Daniel has provided info on Twitter and has been known to be helpful to the community, J at Copperhead has been amazing with correcting any technical misunderstandings

Replying to

... I have had as well as being very transparent about where his company is going now. From my perspective, the target customer base is quite different and you may want to evaluate the respective sustainability of the business models but both OS's are security wise, world class.

Replying to

GrapheneOS is an open source project. It's supported by businesses rather than being a business itself. CopperheadOS is not open source and is no longer even source available. They ripped off my legacy work and fraudulently claim ownership over it. What do you think they do?

Replying to

All they've really done is pay inexperienced / cheap developers to do a poor job porting my legacy code to newer releases, along with adding DRM/tracking and other changes tied to their business. They do not do any real privacy/security research or engineering work...

Replying to

I'm not here for a history lesson with all due respect. I'm just here to run the code.

Replying to

You aren't welcome to do that. I'm not giving you a history lesson. I'm letting you know that you're complicit in abuse and harm perpetrated on myself and others. The only reason that has gone on for so long and caused so much damage is people continuing to support that company.

Replying to

You have a funny definition of “abuse”.

Replying to

Betraying the arrangements made with the project, taking over the infrastructure preventing any further updates to existing devices, stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars of donations, spending years making false / damaging claims about myself and GrapheneOS, harassing myself

Replying to

and other developers with threats, ultimatums and gaslighting, making fraudulent / retroactive edits to accounting to screw me over including filing an inaccurate tax filing, filing a fraudulent registration of copyright to my work after breaking ties with the project, and more.

1:23 PM · Apr 21, 2020Twitter Web App

Replying to

Quote Tweet

Replying to @DanielMicay @aggregat and 2 others

I didn't do any of that, sunshine

Replying to

I said that were complicit in it and are enabling it by whitewashing James Donaldson and being supportive of him. I never said that you did any of it. I said that you were an enabler, and the same applies to anyone else lending them any kind of support, financial or marketing.

Show replies