Conversation

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
I don't have the knowledge now nor am I likely to in the future to understand what happened between these guys. Daniel has provided info on Twitter and has been known to be helpful to the community, J at Copperhead has been amazing with correcting any technical misunderstandings
2
3
... I have had as well as being very transparent about where his company is going now. From my perspective, the target customer base is quite different and you may want to evaluate the respective sustainability of the business models but both OS's are security wise, world class.
2
4
GrapheneOS is an open source project. It's supported by businesses rather than being a business itself. CopperheadOS is not open source and is no longer even source available. They ripped off my legacy work and fraudulently claim ownership over it. What do you think they do?
1
1
Betraying the arrangements made with the project, taking over the infrastructure preventing any further updates to existing devices, stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars of donations, spending years making false / damaging claims about myself and GrapheneOS, harassing myself
2
Show replies