How does it compare to Graphene? (If you've used both?)
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Conversation
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
As far as I know, GrapheneOS is a fork of Copperhead and broadly understood as its successor.
twitter.com/DanielMicay/st
(Daniel Micay/Graphene accuses James Donaldson/Copperhead of scam/fraud but please DYOR!)
This Tweet is unavailable.
1
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Exactly, original CopperheadOS is continued but the more I read about the reasons of the split, the more I tend to turn away from CH OS and rely on Graphene OS.
twitter.com/DanielMicay/st (Mil-Contractor=Raytheon? 🤔)
Maybe or know some background info?
This Tweet is unavailable.
2
1
I don't have the knowledge now nor am I likely to in the future to understand what happened between these guys. Daniel has provided info on Twitter and has been known to be helpful to the community, J at Copperhead has been amazing with correcting any technical misunderstandings
2
1
3
James is a scammer who repeatedly makes fraudulent claims about myself, GrapheneOS and CopperheadOS. He has been highly abusive to myself and GrapheneOS. He has caused immense harm to open source privacy and security work, which CopperheadOS is not. You cannot support both of us.
2
Your tweet is enough to make you complicit in the harm and fraud being perpetrated against us. You're not welcome to follow me, or to use my work either via GrapheneOS or forks of the legacy code like CopperheadOS if you're going to be complicit in causing harm to us.
1
1
Hi Daniel, I currently run Graphene. Who I follow on Twitter is not indicative of an endorsement. I believe both OS's are an enhancement to non AOSP software.
You're welcome to block me but I'll run the OS until you're no longer supporting it.
Have a good day.
1
Supporting it makes you complicit in causing harm to open source projects / developers including myself through your support and whitewashing for abuse and fraud. If you support them, you're volunteering to be listed as one of their supporters complicit in the harm they cause.
Stating my opinion on the OS's relative security to other non AOSP software is not “support” nor is it “whitewashing”. I'm speaking from my own experience.
If I were you, I'd think very carefully about putting my name on a public “list” especially if there are accusations.
1
1
I've included you in the list of people complicit in the fraud and harm perpetrated by Copperhead and James Donaldson. I'll make it very clear that what you've done is to make public statements in support of them on Twitter. If you don't stand behind what you said, let me know.
1
Show replies