How does it compare to Graphene? (If you've used both?)
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Conversation
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
As far as I know, GrapheneOS is a fork of Copperhead and broadly understood as its successor.
twitter.com/DanielMicay/st
(Daniel Micay/Graphene accuses James Donaldson/Copperhead of scam/fraud but please DYOR!)
This Tweet is unavailable.
1
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Exactly, original CopperheadOS is continued but the more I read about the reasons of the split, the more I tend to turn away from CH OS and rely on Graphene OS.
twitter.com/DanielMicay/st (Mil-Contractor=Raytheon? 🤔)
Maybe or know some background info?
This Tweet is unavailable.
2
1
I don't have the knowledge now nor am I likely to in the future to understand what happened between these guys. Daniel has provided info on Twitter and has been known to be helpful to the community, J at Copperhead has been amazing with correcting any technical misunderstandings
2
1
3
... I have had as well as being very transparent about where his company is going now. From my perspective, the target customer base is quite different and you may want to evaluate the respective sustainability of the business models but both OS's are security wise, world class.
2
1
4
GrapheneOS is an open source project. It's supported by businesses rather than being a business itself. CopperheadOS is not open source and is no longer even source available. They ripped off my legacy work and fraudulently claim ownership over it. What do you think they do?
All they've really done is pay inexperienced / cheap developers to do a poor job porting my legacy code to newer releases, along with adding DRM/tracking and other changes tied to their business. They do not do any real privacy/security research or engineering work...
1
1
I'm not here for a history lesson with all due respect. I'm just here to run the code.
1
Show replies