How does it compare to Graphene? (If you've used both?)
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Conversation
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
They do not have a team of engineers. GrapheneOS has drastically more development resources than CopperheadOS. They have zero privacy / security research / engineering work being done. It's nothing more than a poorly maintained, fraudulent fork of my legacy work. Why promote it?
1
1
2
Why are you making false claims about GrapheneOS? Why are you trying to promote a fork ripping off our work and fraudulently claiming ownership of it? You're supporting people that have made my life hell and attacked me, my project and other contributors to it for two years...
1
1
Why do you follow me and how can you claim to like / appreciate my work when you're supporting a fraudulent, proprietary (not open source) fork of my work? Their behavior is disgusting and anyone supporting them is complicit. You're making yourself complicit in abuse and fraud.
If you're not going to do something to make this right, you aren't welcome to follow me or . I also think it's highly disrespectful for you to use my years of work while supporting abuse against me, whether it's directly or via Copperhead's fork of my legacy code.
1
We'll be publishing a list of people complicit in the attacks on our work and you've currently earned yourself a spot in that. People promoting and supporting their scam, especially with financial resources, have been responsible for immense harm to myself, GrapheneOS and others.
1
1
Show replies