Conversation

This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
Neither of the devices is open hardware and neither has open firmware, despite misconceptions created by misleading marketing. The Librem 5 is deliberately locked down to prevent updating the firmware. Neither is close to the security requirements for official GrapheneOS support.
2
9
security features including the hardware-backed keystores used by the OS and apps, support for real verified boot and attestation, modern mitigations, proper IOMMU integration / setup for the components, hardware key derivation support, Wi-Fi anonymity beyond just MAC rand, etc.
3
7
Don't see any reason that open source userspace driver components would require hardware that takes so many steps backwards and throws away so much progress. We'll be very excited to support actual open hardware/firmware RISC-V phones built to meet existing security standards.
2
6
Certainly not hardware rolling nearly everything back so much while not even actually being more open. Don't need new hardware just to get rid of the proprietary userspace vendor components, especially when the SoC vendor is actively doing a lot the work: linaro.org/blog/dragonboa.
3