Conversation

Huh? The web has been working fine with 3rd party cookies entirely blocked for 2 decades. But never miss a chance to use a crisis as an excuse for rolling back enhanced privacy defaults... Never change, Google...
Quote Tweet
We've temporarily reverted Chrome's SameSite rollout, and intend to pick it back up in the summer. It was a necessary decision given that COVID-19 has redefined how web services are meeting essential needs for so many people right now. blog.chromium.org/2020/04/tempor
2
16
Replying to
SameSite cookies are a CSRF mitigation, not a privacy enhancement. SameSite=Strict stops cookies from being sent cross-origin and should be set for all cookies in newly developed code. SameSite=Lax still sends them for cross-origin GET requests for compatibility with legacy code.
2
Replying to and
If you disable third party cookies, existing cookies for a third party origin are still sent with requests to it. The only way that SameSite would improve privacy is if every cookie was forced to be SameSite=Strict and developers couldn't switch to SameSite=Lax or SameSite=None.
1
1
Replying to and
SameSite=Strict breaks sites that weren't designed around having static web pages with dynamic content requested via APIs. It means that when you navigate to a site with a link from another origin, the cookies aren't sent via that GET request. It will break legacy login systems.
Show replies