Conversation

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Where's the irony? I think you misunderstand the purpose and focus of the project along with the stage of development. The only hardware that would be better than Pixels is custom hardware catered to it and that's not currently something realistic... sorry.
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
It's not advertised and the main page makes it incredibly clear that it's in a very early state of being revived and developed. The device support section clearly explains the hardware requirements. The currently supported devices offer the best privacy/security. No irony at all.
1
1
Replying to and
There are drawbacks to having the device broadcast itself as a GrapheneOS device to the network. Blending in with the crowd has advantages. It would be trivial to point these at a GrapheneOS server by default but I haven't because it probably needs to be a user-facing GUI option.
1
Show replies