Conversation

Replying to

and

هذي فكرة عن Plasma Mobile من موقعهم تحت عنوان: < توزيعات تقدم بلازما موبايل Distributions offering Plasma Mobile > plasma-mobile.org/get/ وهذا رابط تحميل النظام بصيغة iso لتشغيله داخل نظام وهمي: images.plasma-mobile.org/iso/

plasma-mobile.org

Distributions offering Plasma Mobile

Listed below are distributions that ship Plasma Mobile. Please check the information for each distribution to see if your device is supported. Mobile Manjaro ARM Manjaro ARM is the Manjaro distribu...

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

Replying to

and

نظام postmarketOS موجه للأجهزة القديمة ومبني على نظامAlpine Linux ، والواجهة الرسومية له هي Plasma Mobile . يعني تقدر تجربه عن طريق تحميل Plasma Mobile .

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

Replying to

and

ما لك إلا هاتف Pine64 لأنه يدعم تثبيت النظام. هذا فيديو فيه عرض عن النظام بعد تثبيته على الهاتف:

Quote Tweet

PINE64

@thepine64

Sep 5, 2019

A quick look at #PinePhone @postmarketOS running @kdecommunity Plasma Mobile with open source Lima driver :) youtube.com/watch?v=8V711I

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

Replying to

and

The firmware is not open source, that's entirely untrue. There is nothing open source about the firmware on peripherals or the firmware on the SoC. The only thing that's open source is the late boot chain and OS. It would be nice if people would stop spreading dishonest claims.

Replying to

and

Not only that, but they've gone out of their way to turn the proprietary firmware into a black box that's much harder to inspect than other devices and cannot receive crucial security updates. They've taken the opposite path of opening it up, but rather have made it more closed.

Replying to

and

The reason for that is their attempt at gaming / manipulating the FSF RYF standard, since it considers proprietary firmware fine as long as it's not possible to update it, which is incredibly stupid. It's crucial to provide full security updates and they've prevented doing that.

Replying to

and

The hardware will ship with a bunch of serious, known vulnerabilities on day one with no way to fix them since they've gone out of the way to prevent doing it. They've also gone of their way not to meet basic security standards like offering verified boot on the main SoC too.

6:12 PM · Sep 23, 2019Twitter Web App

Replying to

and

Out of interest: can you provide any links/sources to your claims?

Replying to

and

Can you provide links / sources to the outrageous claim that a proprietary ARM SoC and a bunch of other proprietary hardware does not have proprietary firmware? It's not me making the incredible and clearly false claims. The burden of proof isn't on me to disprove clear nonsense.

Show replies

Replying to

and

Quote Tweet

Replying to @olddellian and @Puri_sm

And microcode inside the CPU, and proprietary firmware inside the Librem 5's baseband module, and... Everything. I bet there are ~zero "RYF" devices not using that exception. It's doing real harm to user freedom. I want my baseband firmware in /lib/firmware, not some spiflash!