You definitively lied about the licensing of Ubuntu, Ubuntu Touch, and about metrics collection.
Conversation
No, I didn't lie about anything, and you're making clearly false claims that are easily verified as such. AOSP does not have telemetry. Ubuntu has telemetry. It's a clear cut lie for you to claim otherwise. Your misleading spin claiming AOSP isn't open source is more of the same.
3
You're just proving how thoroughly dishonest and unethical you are by doubling down on your scumbag behavior. You came to a thread about open AsourceOSP-based operating systems to attack them with dishonest and completely inaccurate claims. Why are you here trying to cause harm?
1
The thread is not about AOSP. Is about a fine project from the FSFE, to provide Free Software applications to Android.
1
I suggest trying to actually read through the tweets rather than just lazily inserting some scummy self-promotion based on attacking other projects with misinformation. The app fills one of the gaps in open source AOSP-based operating systems without Google apps / services...
2
It's more than that those apps may be used on AOSP based variants or on others. You're assuming only one purpose.
1
Try reading the thread. All I'm doing is responding to your inaccurate and misleading comment. You chose to double down and turn it into a bunch of dishonest, unethical behavior. You could have just backed down from your misleading attack, but you didn't.
1
But anyway, nothing from this community surprises me anymore. Dishonesty is the default and anything goes as long as it promotes your preferred software stack and licensing, even if it means harming others and supporting sexism / rape / pedophilia. Your community is disgusting.
1
This tweet disproves all your claims. Thanks for making your lies so obvious.
1
Projecting your dishonesty onto other people countering isn't going to work. Anyone reading this thread can see you're just posting ignorant nonsense and dishonest claims, as is so typical. You jumped into a thread about open source projects to attack them with misinformation.
1
Having your own subjective software and license preferences is fine but don't go around making dishonest attacks on other projects and trying to harm them to promote your preferred ones. You aren't succeeding at advocating for what you're trying to promote. It just looks bad.