That's absolutely a technical security issue, and only the greenest security person would have allowed it to happen.
Conversation
I don't see how it's a technical security issue that the company the project was relying on and delegating to ended up stabbing the project in the back. What you're doing is coming from an incredibly ignorant/entitled position where you think I can/should do everything myself.
1
That's not it at all, I think if it was your project you should have planned for what happens if a rogue employee tries to harm the project. this is literally security 101.
1
Again, you have absolutely no clue what happened and you're just posting from a completely ignorant and entitled perspective. It was a two person startup. The CEO, 50% owner of shares and director of the board was not simply some rogue employee. The compromise wasn't technical.
2
So wait, that sounds like you tried to seize someone else's project if they were CEO.
1
I suggest working on your reading comprehension and actually trying to come to a basic understanding about what happened before making ignorant comments about it. The open source project is mine. The company funding / supporting it stabbed it in the back. Do you understand now?
1
1
1
You are contradicting yourself. It sounds like you didnt own anything that was "taken" from you and you're here complaining about it.
1
I'm not contradicting myself. You lack the basic reading comprehension and reasoning skills required to understand simple things. It's not hard to understand that there's an open source project and there was a company supporting it which broke the agreements made with it.
1
Yes, I understand that. I'm telling you that that's normal and that a competent administrator would have planned for that possibility.
1
You didnt even own your infrastructure and domains? That's novice level and I hope you learn from it.
1
What part are you not understanding about it being a 2 person startup with each person owning 50% of the shares? You talk about it as if it was an established company with employees and people with specialized roles which couldn't be further from the reality. It was two people.