Conversation

That's not what happened. Now, here is where I'm going to call you out as someone being incredibly dishonest. You're pushing false narratives. If people don't like being called out for doing this, they should stop doing it.
Quote Tweet
Replying to @marshray and @DanielMicay
And seeing someone flip out and claim they’re being personally attacked the first time someone says “well I don’t see that your proposal brings all the benefits you claim in our usage” is a big red flag.
1
1
I'm not flipping out, I'm not the one claiming there were personal attacks and that's clearly not what happened. Someone wrote an incredibly misleading and inaccurate summary / comparison of my work without actually bothering to look into it and I responded to that countering it.
1
1
Quote Tweet
Replying to @DanielMicay @AzureCrimsonE and @damienmiller
i.e. why compare specifically to jemalloc and not everything else? I have some comparisons about the philosophy / approach to OpenBSD malloc because it's the closest cousin of it and is the most direct inspiration for it. It just stopped being a viable platform for what I wanted.
1
Quote Tweet
Replying to @DanielMicay @AzureCrimsonE and @damienmiller
I don't portray design choices in hardened_malloc as being more valid or better but rather I explain why it takes the approach that it does based on the goals and compromises. The jemalloc design isn't any less modern and it's not badly implemented. It's just not the same thing.
1