Conversation

Replying to
Consider the possibility that others also want to β€œdo useful work in peace” and if they contribute their time to write up professional feedback on a technical proposal only to immediately be accused of being personally dishonest it makes further useful discussion impossible.
1
1
Replying to
There's nothing professional about posting unsubstantiated assumptions and misinformation about someone's work to dismiss it as not useful, in order to promote the direction they support. They presented an 'expert' opinion on it without having a clue what they were talking about.
1
1
Replying to and
The only reason I became involved in that thread was to defend my work from someone presenting it as useless because they work on something in the same area they want to promote. They knew they didn't know what they were talking about and still misled people about it anyway.
1
Replying to and
It's not fair having someone present it in such a misleading way and act as if they're on an expert on the topic when they're not and didn't even do basic research to form an opinion. It's not legitimate criticism and misleads people not in a position to evaluate it themselves.
1
Replying to and
They could have read through what it is and said they don't think they should switch because the project isn't mature / tested enough, or the performance compromises are too high, or some other legitimate criticism instead of misrepresenting what it is and what it does.
1
1
Show replies