So, not only has the Tor Project been complicit in previous attacks on my work, but they officially support spreading dishonest attacks on it and misrepresent calling that out as making a personal attack:
lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-
The security community is a toxic waste dump.
Conversation
Replying to
I just read that thread and I think you're 100% in the wrong here. You responded with unwarranted hostility to someone who simply didn't understand your project's advantages.
Nobody was dishonest or spreading misinformation and you gave up an opportunity to explain your work.
1
3
Replying to
Yet they're speaking as an expert as if they do understand it, misleading other people about it, which is what I find dishonest and have a serious issue with, especially since they didn't simply make one post to the mailing list but rather have started up a pattern of attacks.
Even assuming that this is a comparison between the best and worst allocators ever written he can still just be ignorant or misinformed and your response alleges intentional dishonesty with malicious intent without a clear citation proving it.
2
1
1
I didn't say they had malicious intent aimed at causing harm. I said they were being dishonest, to promote their own work and dismiss the possibility of something having substantial advantages (with costs) compared to their approach. I made sure to be clear with what I said.
1
Show replies