Conversation

You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
Replying to and
I try to imagine every possible way that conversation could continue and every single one of them was more depressing than getting myself to shut up then and now, which was also bad but like, least bad in context
1
8
Replying to and
I usually avoid doing it with politics since it's pointless to argue about people's religious beliefs. I'm still easily drawn into long arguments with idiots though. The main reason is it bothers me that they're misleading other people. It doesn't happen in a private message.
3
1
Replying to and
right. my view here is: changing minds of people in public (where many people may read what you're saying and be affected by it) is essentially propaganda, because none of us are driven purely by logical inference. so you essentially want to do counterpropaganda. /
1
6
Replying to and
I can resist doing it when it's about politics but when it's a topic where I'm actually an expert it's hard to resist. The strong compulsion to do it goes away as it becomes clearer no one sane is going to read that deeply into the thread, or it's already effectively settled.
2
2
Replying to and
is there any real difference beteen propaganda on political or technical topics? I feel like you'd be the person to know it works basically the same, cf. your recent thread on Firefox's approach to privacy. Or maybe you do and I misunderstand you.
1
2