Conversation

I don't think calling it DRM is a mislabel. It would say exactly the same thing about a video game using this feature to enforce that people don't block in-game advertisements or bypass the need to pay micropayments for features or virtual currency.

Quote Tweet

BrendanEich

@BrendanEich

Jul 25, 2019

Replying to @DanielMicay @justsee and @bcrypt

You picked a fight. "DRM" abuse, then "enforced viewing". Ad fraud is real and the $320B/year growing to $1T system uses JS nonsense against it, fruitlessly except for the CYA shakedown artists who sell tag-level antifraud. G & FB use what you mislabel "DRM". We aim to as well.

Replying to

This is false. Without safetynet users still get Brave's baseline features: ad/tracker blocking, fingerprinting protection, cross-site referer blinding, &c. They even can opt into Brave Rewards and fund their own anonymous donations. They just can't take 70% ad revshare. Yeesh!

Replying to

and

I'm going to reply to my reply. You tweeted that we replace ads in page slots. False. You abused DRM to describe anti-fraud tech that limits only Brave user ads, which are opt in. These are either hugely ignorant errors on your part, or lies. No third way!

Replying to

Oh, so it's a problem when I do it, but you can do it. You're trying to make a subtle distinction about what it means to replace ads, and I don't agree with it. It's you that's being incredibly dishonest by misrepresenting my statements as false or dishonest when they're not.

Replying to

and

I didn't abuse the term DRM. It's the way the term is used among almost everyone that I speak to. I'm hardly the only one using the term to include features like anti-modding / anti-cheat / anti-fraud trying to stop the user from doing something with code on their device...

12:17 AM · Jul 26, 2019Twitter Web App

Replying to

Stop replying to yourself. eff.org/issues/drm

Replying to

This is how I use Twitter. Stop dictating to me how to use the site. You're the one choosing to jump into my feed. If you don't want to talk to me, you have the choice not to engage with me in the first place. If you talk to me, I'm going to use Twitter how I've always used it.

Show replies

Replying to

and

I'm not lying, and what I said isn't wrong. Feel free to stick to your story but all you've done is given me some major motivation to write up something more substantial on this and turn it into a far bigger issue with how you've approached this. That's why I tweeted at all.

Replying to

You need to justify your claims. Write something if you like. Twitter is valid expression of truth-claims, at least at first and from putative good-faith actors. Live up to that.