Conversation

I used to be optimistic about Brave, but I no longer consider it to be a good project. It has had some serious issues with security and the intent behind it is starting to seem nefarious. Monetizing other people's content was always sketchy and their DRM is going far beyond EME.
4
50
Replying to and
How is their intent nefarious? Have seen a lot of vague attempts at casting shade on project with nothing of substance. Criticism of monetising content is criticism of entire internet industry, not particular to Brave? In that context theirs seems like better model?
1
Also, enumerating badness simply isn't a viable approach to privacy and security. The same goes for doing it to try externally replacing the monetization model for the web. Needing to use DRM to try to make their broken model work demonstrates exactly why it's not a viable one.
1
How is using SafetyNet going to make any difference when it's such a weak software-based attestation model, anyway? They could use the hardware-based attestation but a model based on the root of trust rather than pairing is inherently not very strong. Way better than that though.
1
Show replies
Replying to and
I'm not spreading misinformation. Explain to me what purpose you have for adopting SafetyNet as part of Brave Ads on Android if it's not an implementation of DRM. It's clearly a poor attempt at enforcing people are actually viewing the ads. How is it not a DRM implementation?
2
1
Show replies