Daniel Micay on Twitter: "@ihackbanme Using Rust to replace C and C++ for low-level niches not covered well by high level languages and runtimes doesn't mean they aren't still going to be moving to higher level memory safe languages elsewhere. It wouldn't make much sense to use a low-level language (Rust) everywhere." / Twitter

Interesting tweet/twist. Always thought MSFT would push .net for memory-safe development. 🧐🤔

Quote Tweet

Jul 16, 2019

What if you could eliminate a common class of vulnerabilities by changing the language you used? MSRC is publishing a series on why Microsoft is looking at @rustlang for memory-safe development and why we think you should too. See the first post here: msrc-blog.microsoft.com/2019/07/16/a-p

2

Daniel Micay

@DanielMicay

Replying to

@ihackbanme

Using Rust to replace C and C++ for low-level niches not covered well by high level languages and runtimes doesn't mean they aren't still going to be moving to higher level memory safe languages elsewhere. It wouldn't make much sense to use a low-level language (Rust) everywhere.

11:53 AM · Jul 17, 2019Twitter Web Client

1

Like

Conversation