Conversation

to qualify for "GitHub Sponsors" as a developer you have to join a "waitlist", submit yourself to an intrusive "rigorous vetting process" and then be evaluated by an anonymous "Advisory Panel" that decides if you pass. i wonder where i've seen this before 🤔
5
47
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to and
FWIW, I have both PayPal and Bitcoin donations at grapheneos.org/donate and the vast majority of the donations have been via Bitcoin. I doubt that would be the case if I added direct credit card donations via Stripe but they would take substantial fees: stripe.com/en-ca/pricing.
1
2
Even if you're fine with people getting donations back fraudulently due to later regret (which may not seem so bad), you need to win the dispute or you pay the fee and your account ends up flagged for involvement in fraud. Leads to fund freezes and eventually losing the account.
2
1
I hate exchanges, and don't trust them one bit. I was previously beginning a process of slowly getting ~1000 USD at a time turned into CAD and deposited into my bank account, and the exchange that I was using (Quadriga) finished an exit scam right before I sent them another 1k.
1
Replying to and
my problems with Bi/tcoin are primarily political in nature (it's extremely destructive and also totally controlled in practice by like five guys who want to launder money from China, both bad long term outlook); I have used it extensively and know what it's capable of
1
4
Replying to and
Bitcoin isn't very private at all even when not reusing addresses but I would like it far more if it was. I see support for laundering money as a necessary evil similar to criminals benefiting from end-to-end encrypted messaging. I do agree proof of work is a serious problem.
2
Show replies