Daniel Micay on Twitter: "@saleemrash1d A currency aimed at privacy and censorship resistance shouldn't be strongly tied to a company that's able to exert control over it to the point that they can retroactively bake in a permanent form of rent seeking. It would demonstrate that it's not viable for the purported usage." / Twitter

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

Replying to

A currency aimed at privacy and censorship resistance shouldn't be strongly tied to a company that's able to exert control over it to the point that they can retroactively bake in a permanent form of rent seeking. It would demonstrate that it's not viable for the purported usage.

8:57 PM · Jun 23, 2019Twitter Web Client

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

Replying to

Or mine the coin like everyone else and raise the value of the holdings in it by working on it. It wasn't the end of the world since it wasn't permanent. Having it in perpetuity makes it non-viable as a serious currency. Introducing it retroactively also makes it even worse.

1

Show replies

Conversation