Daniel Micay on Twitter: "@Puri_sm @arstechnica This is a company making a fork of open source code and including a backdoor in it. These aren't Google Android devices. How exactly do you prevent someone doing the same with any of your projects? You don't, and as usual you're misleading people with your dishonest approach." / Twitter

Stories like this one from

are not unusual: arstechnica.com/information-te That's why Purism takes the digital supply chain so seriously. Read about our efforts to protect the digital supply chain here: puri.sm/posts/protecti

2

19

27

Replying to

and

This is a company making a fork of open source code and including a backdoor in it. These aren't Google Android devices. How exactly do you prevent someone doing the same with any of your projects? You don't, and as usual you're misleading people with your dishonest approach.

9:48 AM · Jun 8, 2019Twitter Web Client

Replying to

and

Unlike mainstream devices, you won't support full verified boot and attestation for the entirety of all the firmware and the operating system. That's the opposite of making devices more resistant to supply side attacks. The article talks a big game but reality is much different.

4

Replying to

and

You talk about purism or arstechnica Daniel?

1

Replying to

and

The headline and article on Ars is a little bit misleading but that's not what I was talking about. I'm talking about Purism repeatedly attacking iOS and Android by being misleading and even outright dishonest, especially when what they're offering is much worse at these things.

2

1

Show replies

Conversation