Google: We're killing all file managers in Android Q.
Apple: iPad's file manager gets SMB, unzip, and USB support!
When did I enter an alternate dimension?
15
154
672
Conversation
File managers still work. Apps are forced to use the Storage Access Framework for accessing shared storage, which means that users can choose the scope for their access. The app can provide a suggestion, but the API is designed to avoid apps from forcing all or nothing access.
2
2
41
The built-in file manager will also still be there, and that's the interface used for selecting file and directories when apps use the Storage Access Framework. It finally gives users control rather than apps requesting full shared storage access and refusing to work otherwise.
2
18
SAF is just Google's file manager. That doesn't count.
Ground up implementations of feature rich file managers are being crippled, right? Maybe in R?
1
8
That's not an accurate portrayal of SAF. You're misunderstanding what it implements and how it works. An app can request persistent access to a directory tree, which uses the system UI to ask the user to determine access scope. It's entirely usable for implementing file managers.
SAF is a generic file access API. Apps can use as both a client (like a word processor or a file manager) and as a provider (like an app providing access to cloud storage or a network file system). It's not a file manager. It uses the system file manager UI for choosing scope.
1
14
So, for example, a file manager will request persistent access to a directory tree. The user can select the root of the volume in the SAF system UI to grant full access to the volume. The file manager now has full, persistent access to that storage volume but it's up to the user.
1
20
Show replies