Conversation

By the way, I haven't used PGP for a while beyond bootstrapping better forms of authenticated encryption or signing. I do occasionally deal with looking at the backlog of PGP encrypted emails, and I will sign emails as needed to confirm my identity, but I won't encrypt my mail.
1
1
It's a completely garbage legacy technology with awful usability and poor security. I have no reason to encrypt emails to strangers because I'm not going to write anything I wouldn't write publicly here anyway. For anyone I want to talk to privately I switch to using Signal, etc.
3
4
Replying to
Federation is a huge liability in other ways and holds back the privacy and security of the ecosystem by requiring backwards compatibility and ending up with a bunch of awful / poorly maintained implementations. I used to believe in XMPP + OMEMO, but I don't use it in practice.
1
2
I think Matrix is a great example of everything that's wrong with federation. It was an opportunity to prove otherwise, but it did the opposite. Trying to be all things for all people and prioritizing features above privacy / security is a serious issue. Extensions are an issue.
1
I think Signal has ended up being such a good option largely because it has centralized development and implementations. Once it has usernames, other federated servers for those could work, but they'd need to be forced to upgrade promptly, which is probably just not realistic.
1
So, lets say that one of these is used by 100k people and stops being promptly upgraded. They want to drop support for the old protocol version, as it's holding back development and those users also aren't going to be secure. What happens? Should they just break that server?
1
Show replies