Hardening in Android Q:
security.googleblog.com/2019/05/queue-
Scudo won't be used on GrapheneOS for 64-bit, but it will be nice to have for 32-bit where the far more hardened github.com/GrapheneOS/har implementation isn't available due to completely dependence on a very large address space.
Conversation
Replying to
Contributions are welcome if you feel like it. We definitely strive for a balance perf/security rather than full security. Standalone (non sanitizer_common dependent) version is being committed @ github.com/llvm/llvm-proj
1
Replying to
github.com/GrapheneOS/har is certainly balancing performance, memory usage and security too. It takes a much different approach inherited from allocators like OpenBSD malloc rather than allocators like dlmalloc and is specifically designed around the large address space on 64-bit.
1
There's some documentation on the approach in the README. It was written to be a replacement for the previous port of OpenBSD malloc and shares a lot of the basic design concepts with it. It does lean more towards security than performance and cares a lot about low fragmentation.
1
I would be using a slab allocator approach with out-of-line slab metadata even for a fully performance oriented allocator, like the Linux kernel. Bitmaps instead of free lists is the main difference from a pure performance-oriented approach but jemalloc uses bitmaps to pack data.
Mapping from addresses to the slab metadata can be done in various ways like the alignment trick in jemalloc, PartitionAlloc and OpenBSD malloc. That's not needed here due to reserving isolated regions for slab allocations metadata (slabs, large allocations, and all other state).
1
That could still be a perfectly suitable approach in a purely performance-oriented allocator. I'd just throw away all the security features layered on top, replace bitmaps with free lists and add small array-based thread caches like jemalloc to amortize the cost of locking.
1
Show replies