Conversation

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

Replying to

Chrome and other Chromium-based browsers. Edge will have it unless they choose to go out of the way to disable it, since they're moving to using Chromium. Edge on Android has always been a fork of Chromium primarily switching to using Microsoft services instead of Google.

Replying to

and

I don't think it's particularly relevant if Mozilla chooses to embrace a standard at this point. If it's not compelling, no one will care, and it won't matter. If it is compelling, it will be yet another thing web developers will adopt which drives users away from Firefox.

Replying to

and

And this is exactly why $MSFT decision to move Edge to Chromium was harmful to the Web.

Replying to

and

I'd like to know what you think is different about this case compared to every other feature introduced by other browsers. Edge was going to implement this before moving to Chromium, as noted in

@BRIAN_____

's initial tweet, but they'll get it for free so it'll ship right away.

Replying to

and

Looks like a useful feature to me, and worth participating in the design process if you want things to be done differently. Maybe repeatedly being manipulative and dishonest, spreading FUD about competitors and poisoning the waters for collaboration is harmful. Just a thought.

Replying to

and

I'd like to hear a reasonable explanation of why the feature is so bad that it's worth campaigning against. It looks to me that Mozilla just wants to oppose AMP and anything that makes it better as a whole, regardless of whether something is a good idea or not. It's a bad look.

7:41 PM · Apr 18, 2019Twitter Web Client