Conversation

Don't hand over your email. Don't hand over your name. Don't hand over your social media. Don't hand over any personally identifiable information to use Bitcoin, no matter how new and shiny the latest toy is. The biggest gaping security hole is the one you dig yourself.

154

461

Replying to

and

Don't use mobile wallets of any kind. Use full node.

TDevD [No KYC, no T&C, no

Replying to

and

Full node? Yes. Cold storage? Yes, if you are hodling and have shit to put aside. Don't know about you but I need a wallet on the street. That's how I roll.

Replying to

and

When you have mobile wallet regardless of how works (server backend or spv) google/apple knows you using bitcoin. Dojo will remove reliance on server so that's better for sure. On the other hand i know what you saying...

TDevD [No KYC, no T&C, no

Replying to

and

Lots of anti lite client shit flying around recently. Total denial of reality as it is lived on the street, imo.

Replying to

and

Google/apple and mobile phone architecture is spyware galore. Gsm chip for example is connected to memory bus and can read any memory location. That Librem phone trying to do things right both hardware and software wise.

Replying to

and

> Gsm chip for example is connected to memory bus and can read any memory location Whether or not a component is part of the SoC isn't directly connected to whether or not it's isolated. Separate chips often have DMA, and SoC components usually have better IOMMU configuration.

Replying to

and

I know you are researcher focused on privacy/security in android. What's your opinion on Librem phone and how much is an upgrade re. Privacy/security from usual android phones?

Replying to

and

The desktop Linux software stack is a substantial downgrade from the Android Open Source Project, drastically rolling back privacy and security to an extreme extent. The SoC choice is also a security downgrade, and either way it's still all proprietary rather than open hardware.

8:09 PM · Mar 22, 2019Twitter Web Client

Replying to

and

I don't think it's okay to propagate falsehoods for self-promotion, even if they think the ends justify the means. They are offering a nice feature (kill switch for microphone) while losing dozens of standard hardware security features and moving to a far inferior software stack.

Replying to

and

I think it'd quite harmful to spread falsehoods misleading people into thinking they're going to be more secure with a niche device aimed at putting the Linux desktop software stack on mobile, not privacy and security. An iPhone will still be a substantially more secure choice.

Show replies