Maybe I'm missing something but I think there's still a need for interaction within the scope of a CoC when you use the library in a major piece of software.
Conversation
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
I wouldn't feel welcome in a project with that Code of Conduct due to being an atheist. I expect many devout Christians, Muslims, etc. feel the same way about a Code of Conduct that I'd support though.
4
1
1
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
There's an intentionally high barrier to entry for contributing code or even reporting a bug but there's an open community around the core developers that's moderated by them on the mailing lists, etc. This code of conduct is meant to extend to that too.
And this should reflect negatively on the project's public image and be a factor in deciding whether to use or continue to use it.
1
It reflects negatively on my view of the project and all I'm trying to say is that I can understand why they would do this based on their beliefs. I think it's a sincere, ridiculous decision rather than trolling. I think this is genuinely meant to reflect their beliefs.
2
3
Show replies
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
Show replies