Conversation

Replying to
To what extend can an app guarantee a state of the system when the underlying integrity is not verifiable? How do you know a sample is genuine (1) and (2) even if it is, we take the report from a system difficult to verify even if AOSP. I am really glad you cont. working on this
1
1
Replying to
There's verified boot for the entire operating system and information about it is surfaced via the key attestation feature. It provides a signed public key certificate for the key including verified boot state + fingerprint and versions of the boot, system and vendor images.
1
1
Replying to and
An attacker could exploit the OS after it boots or could exploit the verified boot process itself but they can't forge this information without exploiting the bootloader or TEE. An important part of what this provides is verification of device identity too, not just integrity.
1
1
Replying to and
For example, consider an attacker compromising the OS after each boot and blocking updates to prevent fixing the vulnerabilities. Attestation will uncover the problem by showing that the OS is not truly being updated, even if the attacker tries to hide that information in the OS.
2
1
Replying to
Yes, this notion is one I seek too, but deriving only the key chain and confirming the identity of the device is one thing. Saying device integrity is intact because the bootloader is genuine is not quite true, especially with hidden TEE.
1
Replying to
The authenticity and integrity of firmware and the OS is verified, not only the bootloader stages. The hardware-backed keystore receives information about the software being verified from the earlier boot stages and incorporates it into the key attestation information.
2
2