There is no opt out feature in a global surveillance state.
Conversation
Replying to
True, but you don't have to make it easy for them. :)
2
4
10
Fyi: imho CopperheadOS can't be trusted anymore. The only dev (Daniel Micay) left the project and deleted the signing keys because the other dude tried to hijack the complete project.
More info:
1
1
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
It's not your source code. Your copyright claims are false and you have no right to sell it or license it. The fact that you're stealing all the money makes it so much worse. You're a scumbag with absolutely no ethics or empathy. It makes it so much worse that you're selling it.
1
I built those projects on my own time over 4 years. I had no employment agreement with Copperhead, I invested the sane money as you did for the shares. I did far more work than you even without considering any of the time spent writing that code too...
1
All you did is completely failing at making it a sustainable business and now you've switched to rent seeking on someone else's work to scam people out of their money just like you scammed me. Stealing the donations sent to support my work is just the icing on the cake really.
1
You have no license to use it commercially. You chose to hijack the infrastructure / company to focus on lining your pockets without doing real work or compensating the person that built everything. Endless lying and manipulation isn't going to work for you in the long term...
All you're doing is building up a massive amount of damages since the entire revenue stream is illegitimate. I expect to be fully compensated for all of it. The same goes for @ncryptcellular, etc. They have no legitimate license to use the code. Copperhead doesn't own it.
1
Why not tell them the truth? I had no license / copyright / employment agreement with Copperhead. There was only a shareholder's agreement with no mention of any code and I bought my shares for the same price as you. Your claim that I traded the code for shares is an obvious lie.
1
Show replies