Hence the initial tweet of the first retraction, to advertise that this paper should be not be used further.
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
But.... although we knew of two additional retractions at the time of
@KateLaskowski 's first tweet, we did not tweet about those because they were still going though due process at their journals, abiding by the journals' request for silence on those pending retractions.1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 13 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
I confess it was challenging to stay silent during the first round of response, which was uniformly supportive of all involved, sympathetic to their error, while knowing that additional retractions involving Pruitt-provided data were en route. ...
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 14 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
I worried about how the 'good-on-you' back-patting sympathy would play out when more retractions came to light.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 13 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
So when the next retraction was official,
@KateLaskowski@ambikamath@NoaPinter and others again did the right thing by publicizing that there was a flawed paper that was retracted and should not be used further.1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 19 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Understandably, once there were two (and more pending) retractions, the community took real notice and became concerned. If two, are there more? How deep does this go? This is where the twitter mob has the potential to take up arms...
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 17 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
But I am very proud to say that the research community has been almost 100% well-behaved and respectful, while still demanding accountability and explanation and correction, all reasonable expectations. I am pleased to be a part of a community with you all. Thank you.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 110 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Yes, there have been some snide remarks, some jokes cracked, and some anger expressed, but the vast majority of the response has been impressive: seeking clarification, information, and concern for Pruitt's collaborators (especially ECS) and for
@Agelenopsis himself1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 29 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
So, to tweet or not to tweet? On balance, twitter I think was a crucial tool to: (1) disseminate news that at least some papers are not to be used further, (2) recruit help examining the remaining >150 papers to hopefully give many of them a clean bill of health, and ....
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 37 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Most importantly to lend moral support and encouragement to the ECS and colleagues who are directly impacted by the cloud of mistrust that was inevitably going to settle over all papers with Pruitt's name on them once retraction #2&3 were public, and maybe clear that cloud
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 29 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit
So, in all this thanks again for being respectful, inquisitive, rigorous, fair, and patient (investigating this matter took @ASNAmNat two months).
-
-
Now, I am going to try to stick to my "no twitter" promise to myself this weekend, I am going to go have fun, relax, edit a grant, prep for class Monday, and read excellent
@ASNAmNat student papers to restore my faith in science.0 proslijeđenih tweetova 133 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Odgovor korisnicima @DanielBolnick @ASNAmNat
Thank you for your leadership.
0 replies 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđaHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.