You just want to keep low income POCs out of your rich white communities. @DarrellIssa @DanaRohrabacher @KenCalvert @MimiWaltersCA
-
-
Ever think those neighborhoods are not conducive to recovery?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I also think it's safe to say that not all of them have families.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It seems to me you want them to live in places where they have easy access to drugs
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
residential zones are also less likely to have the liquor store on the corner
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
isn't it in OUR collective best interest to promote the most positive enviro we can
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
safe residential zones = less temptation = more services = more opportunity
-
more drug addicts & alcoholics placed in family neighborhood = families less safe
-
you keep forgetting the "recovering" part of this. & the concept of SOBER homes.
-
families who don’t expect gov to put drunks&addicts next door won’t be forgotten
-
there are more important things & people who shouldn't be forgotten.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
they also mean better chance of recovery & thus less a drain on our gov't resources
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
also, you have to amend FEHA for this to apply to CA. And that isn't happening.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.