.@DanaRohrabacher What evidence do you have that tens of thousands of research papers on climate science are bogus?
-
-
Replying to @TenneyNaumer
@TenneyNaumer predictions of major temp jump failed to materialize thus CO2 theory on which theory based is wrong, thus AGW studies R bogus4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
flat cat Retweeted Gavin Schmidt
@DanaRohrabacher@NASAGISS found your major "temp jump".https://twitter.com/ClimateOfGavin/status/708701233763188737 …flat cat added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @flatcatcanyon
@flatcatcanyon MMann, along with 18 other prominent AGW advocates, now acknowledge 18 yrs of steady temp. R U a denier?3 replies 4 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
.
@DanaRohrabacher@flatcatcanyon Dana, that's not a fair characterization. Please see what I've written about this: https://www.facebook.com/MichaelMannScientist/posts/1040204106035791 …3 replies 5 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @MichaelEMann
@MichaelEMann Expecting@DanaRohrabacher to fairly characterize anything related to science is a fool's errand@flatcatcanyon1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mike_cal
.
@mike_cal@DanaRohrabacher@flatcatcanyon I like Dana personally. I hope he'll take me up on my invitation for a beer/coffee (one-on-one).4 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @MichaelEMann
.
@MichaelEMann@DanaRohrabacher@flatcatcanyon What's likeable about him? Consigning children to an emerging climate hell isn't likeable1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mike_cal
@mike_cal@DanaRohrabacher@flatcatcanyon People can be misinformed without being malicious.5 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @MichaelEMann
@MichaelEMann My standards are higher for ppl like@DanaRohrabacher who pretend to represent the public interest but don't@flatcatcanyon1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.